Global Research, August 14, 2015
The leader of
the Cuban Revolution insists that we will never stop struggling for peace and
the well-being of all human beings, for every inhabitant on the planet
regardless of skin color or national origin.
Writing is a way to be useful if you believe
that our long-suffering humanity must be better, and more fully educated, given
the incredible ignorance in which we are all enveloped, with the exception of
researchers who in the sciences seek satisfactory answers. This is a word which
implies in a few letters its immense content.
All of us in our youth heard talk at some point
about Einstein, in particular after the explosion of the atomic bombs which
pulverized Hiroshima and Nagasaki, putting an end to the cruel war between the
United States and Japan.
When those bombs were dropped, after the war
unleashed by the attack on the U.S. base at Pearl Harbor, the Japanese Empire
had already been defeated. The United States, whose territory and industries
remained removed from the war, became the country with the greatest wealth and
the best weaponry on Earth, in a world torn apart, full of death, the wounded
and hungry.
The Soviet Union and China together lost more
than 50 million lives, along with enormous material damage. Almost all of the
gold in the world landed in the vaults of the United States. Today it is
estimated that the entirety of this country’s gold reserves reached 8,133.5
tons of this metal. Despite that, tearing up the Bretton Woods accords they
signed, the United States unilaterally declared that it would not fulfill its
duty to back the Troy ounce with the value in gold of its paper money.
The measure ordered by Nixon violated the
commitments made by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. According to a large
number of experts on the subject, the foundation of a crisis was created, which
among other disasters threatens to powerfully batter the economy of this model
of a country. Meanwhile, Cuba is owed compensation equivalent to damages, which
have reached many millions of dollars, as our country has denounced throughout
our interventions in the United Nations, with irrefutable arguments and facts.
As has been expressed with clarity by Cuba’s
Party and government, to advance good will and peace among all the countries of
this hemisphere and the many peoples who are part of the human family, and thus
contribute to the survival of our species in the modest place the universe has
conceded us, we will never stop struggling for peace and the well-being of all
human beings, for every inhabitant on the planet regardless of skin color or
national origin, and for the full right of all to hold a religious belief or
not.
The equal right of all citizens to health,
education, work, food, security, culture, science, and wellbeing, that is, the
same rights we proclaimed when we began our struggle, in addition to those
which emerge from our dreams of justice and equality for all inhabitants of our
world, is what I wish for all. To those who share all or part of these same
ideas, or superior ones along the same lines, I thank you, dear compatriots.
Fidel Castro Ruz
August 13, 2015
On a rainy day last December, President Barack
Obama gathered a small group of senior officials in the Oval Office and placed
a telephone
call to Raúl
Castro. Sitting on a couch to Obama's left were National Security Council aides
Benjamin Rhodes and Ricardo Zuniga, personal emissaries whose 18 months of secret
negotiations were
about to culminate in the first substantive conversation between
the presidents of the United States and Cuba in more than half a century.
Obama later told reporters that he'd
apologized to Castro for talking for such a long time. "Don't worry about
it, Mr. President," Castro responded. "You're still a young man and
have still the time to break Fidel's record—he once spoke seven hours
straight." After Castro finished his own lengthy opening statement, Obama
joked, "Obviously, it runs in the family."
Raúl Castro meets with President Obama on the sidelines of the 7th Summit
of the Americas in Panama City, Panama in April, 2015. Estudio Revolucion/Xinhua/ZUMA
Despite the levity, both leaders understood the seriousness of their 45-minute conversation. "There was," one White House official recalled, "a sense of history in that room."
At noon the next day, the two presidents stunned the
world when they simultaneously announced the
dramatic breakthrough. Obama repudiated 55 years of US efforts to roll back the
Cuban revolution, declaring that
peaceful coexistence made more sense than perpetual antagonism. Both leaders described
a prisoner exchange that had
occurred earlier that morning. For "humanitarian reasons," Cuba had
released Alan Gross, incarcerated since December 2009 for setting up illicit
satellite communications networks as part of a US Agency for International
Development (USAID) "democracy promotion" program. Cuba also released
Rolando Sarraff Trujillo, a CIA spy whom Obama called "one of the most important intelligence
agents that the United States has ever had in Cuba." In return, Obama
commuted the sentences of the last three members of the "Cuban Five" spy
ring—Gerardo Hernández, Antonio Guerrero, and Ramón Labañino—imprisoned for 16
years after they were caught infiltrating anti-Castro Cuban American groups and
providing information that (the United States claimed) allowed
Cuba to shoot down two planes flown into its airspace by an exile group,
killing four Cuban Americans. (The other two members of the Cuban Five had been
released earlier, having completed their sentences.)
But the prisoner exchange was only the beginning. Obama promised to loosen
restrictions on travel and trade, and authorize telecommunications companies to
bring internet services to the island. For its part, Cuba pledged to release 53 political prisoners and engage with the International Red Cross and United Nations on human
rights and prison conditions. Most importantly, the two presidents agreed to
reestablish diplomatic relations. On July 20, Cuba's foreign minister, Bruno
Rodríguez, traveled to Washington to raise the Cuban flag over the former
embassy on 16th Street; on August 14 Secretary of State John Kerry will travel
to Havana to reopen our embassy in the sleek, modernist structure built for
that purpose in 1953.
What brought about this radical change was a unique alignment of political
stars: a shift in public opinion, particularly among Cuban Americans; a
transition in Cuban leadership from Fidel to Raúl, followed by Cuba's slow but
steady evolution toward a market socialist economy; and Latin American leaders
no longer willing to accept Cuba's exclusion from regional affairs. Seizing the
opportunity were a handful of dedicated US legislators, well-financed
lobbyists, Alan Gross' aggressive legal team, an activist pope from Latin
America, and a woman hell-bent on getting pregnant.
But one factor trumped the rest: Obama's determination. He was, one top
aide recalls, "a
president who really wanted to do it."
All the President's Men
Obama's push to break "the shackles of the past" began shortly
after his reelection, when, according to one aide, he "told us we needed
to design a play to run with Cuba." By April 2013, Obama had chosen Rhodes
and Zuniga to lead the negotiations. Rhodes had joined
Obama's 2008 campaign as a speechwriter and was personally close to the
president. "All it takes is one Google search for these guys to know that
Ben speaks to the president, and has daily access, and can be a trusted back
channel," explained a former
White House official. Zuniga, meanwhile, had served in the US Interests Section
in Havana (the embassy stand-in) and as the State Department's acting
coordinator for Cuban affairs.
Over the next 18 months, the two men met nine times with a small team of
Cuban officials in various locales, from Ottawa to Rome. From the start, it was
clear that before any discussion of normalizing relations could occur, both
countries wanted their imprisoned citizens released.
It was a touchy subject, but one we learned had already been broached
following the devastating 2010 earthquake in Haiti, which led to unprecedented
US-Cuban cooperation on disaster relief. Over the next two years, two top State
Department officials—Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, and Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs Julissa Reynoso—secretly
negotiated with Cuban officials in Creole restaurants in Port-au-Prince,
subterranean bars on Manhattan's East Side, and a hotel lounge in Santo
Domingo. US officials focused on freeing Gross, while the Cubans requested that
the wives of Cuban spies Hernández and René González be allowed to visit their
husbands in jail. (These women's visas had previously been denied because they
too were suspected of being covert agents.) The Cuban position "started
with 'Treat our guys better,'" says a US official with knowledge of the
talks, and evolved into "'We want them all home.'" By September 2011,
the Cubans had explicitly proposed swapping the Cuban Five for Alan Gross.
But US officials believed that such a direct exchange would be politically
toxic. Instead, they hoped their growing rapport would convince the Cubans to
free Gross. As a show of good faith, they arranged for the wives of Hernández
and González to secretly visit them. In exchange, the Cubans permitted Judy
Gross regular visits with her husband, held in a military hospital in Havana.
"We thought this would lead to the release of Alan Gross," one US
official recalls. But the Cubans continued to hold out for the swap, even as
the parole dates for two of their five spies neared. Eventually US negotiators
realized their strategy was doomed. In May 2012, Clinton received a memo from
her team that stated: "We have to continue negotiating with the Cubans on
the release of Alan Gross but cannot allow his situation to block an advance of
bilateral relations...The Cubans are not going to budge. We either deal with
the Cuban Five or cordon those two issues off."
The memo hit at an opportune time. Clinton and Obama had just returned from the
Sixth Summit of the Americas, where they'd been chastised by heads of states
furious over the US stance on Cuba. "It was clearly an irritant and a drag
on our policy in the region," says Roberta S. Jacobson, assistant
secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs.
Clinton had previously pushed the White
House to liberalize regulations on educational travel to Cuba, finally going
directly to the president to bypass White House aides worried about political
fallout. In the wake of the summit debacle, she instructed her deputy to
assemble what one adviser called "the full monty" of potential
actions to change Cuba policy. "I recommended to President Obama that he
take another look at our embargo," Clinton recalls in her memoir. "It
wasn't achieving its goals and it was holding back our broader agenda across
Latin America."
Following his reelection, Obama approached Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry
about replacing Clinton as secretary of state—and immediately raised the
prospect of a new approach to Cuba. Kerry was receptive. As chairman of the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he'd been a vocal critic of the USAID
democracy promotion programs that financed Gross' secret missions to Cuba.
Kerry had also long opposed the US economic embargo, and played a key role
in normalizing relations with Vietnam—a triumph he hoped to repeat with Cuba.
Still, when a new round of secret talks began in June 2013, Kerry was not privy to them.
Only a handful of US officials knew, among them Vice President Joe Biden, White
House chief of staff Denis McDonough, and National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
No one at the Pentagon was "read in." Although Kerry was eventually
brought into the loop, "we kept it fairly tight on our side, and the
Cubans, I think, did the same on their side," a senior US official said.
"We didn't want any wrench to be thrown in the gears that could complicate
attempts to secure Alan Gross' release."
The effort at secrecy was aided by Canada, which allowed the two sides to
meet in Ottawa and later Toronto. The Cubans' top priority was still getting
their spies back—particularly Gerardo Hernández, who, as
the ringleader of the Cuban Five and the broader crew of spies known as the
"Wasp Network," was
serving two life sentences. Zuniga and Rhodes came to the table with a more
fluid approach. "We had no fixed vision of what an agreement would
be," recalls a White House official knowledgeable about the talks.
Instead, they wanted to "try out different formulas" to explore what
could be agreed on. "We never went in thinking there would be a grand
bargain."
But politically the White House was in a tricky spot. If all that came out
of the talks was a prisoner exchange and a few travel and trade tweaks, Obama's
initiative would not register as a serious policy change. Lifting the embargo was in
Congress' hands, but restoring diplomatic ties was the one dramatic action he
could take unilaterally.
"Look, I wasn't even born when this policy was put in place," he
told the Cubans. "We want to hear and talk about the future."
During the first negotiating sessions, the US team had to listen to the
Cubans recite the long history of US depredations against the
island, starting with the Spanish-American War in 1898. To old hands, it was
the requisite throat-clearing to be endured before getting down to real
business. But Rhodes had no prior dealings with Cuba and at one point
interrupted the diatribe. "Look, I wasn't even born when this policy was
put in place," he told the Cubans. "We want to hear and talk about the
future."
Historical disagreements were only the beginning. The US team wasn't
willing to talk about the USAID programs or Guantánamo; the Cubans weren't
willing to discuss human rights or US fugitives hiding in their country.
"There were a lot of dry wells for us and for them," according to a
White House official. Both sides were eager to talk about the prisoners,
but a straight-up trade—Gross for the three remaining members of the Cuban
Five—was still a nonstarter for the White House. The president had said
repeatedly that Gross had done nothing wrong, was not a spy, and therefore
could not be exchanged for spies. In the administration's public portrayal of
Gross, he was just a development specialist attempting to bring internet access
to Cuba's small Jewish community. To the Cubans, Gross was a covert operative
engaged in a program to subvert their government, and the Cuban Five were
patriots protecting their country against the far-right zealots of Little
Havana.
To break the deadlock, the US negotiators raised the case of Rolando Sarraff Trujillo, who'd been a top CIA mole inside Cuban intelligence until his arrest in
the mid-1990s. Sarraff had provided the United States with information that led to the prosecution of many Cuban spies, including Ana Montes, the Defense Intelligence
Agency's top Cuba specialist; State Department employee Walter Kendall Myers
and his wife, Gwendolyn; and the Wasp Network—including the Cuban Five.
During negotiations in Toronto in January 2014, the Americans suggested
that if the ailing Gross were released on humanitarian grounds, they would swap
the three Cuban spies for Sarraff. But the Cubans did not want to give up
Sarraff—a double agent they considered so treacherous they'd held him in
solitary for 18 years.
Negotiations got even pricklier in May 2014, when the Obama administration
announced it was swapping five
Taliban leaders held at Guantánamo for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a US soldier captured and imprisoned by the Taliban since 2009. The political uproar in Congress and the media
was intense, especially after Bergdahl was reported to have deserted his post.
From the US perspective, this made a similar trade with Cuba completely out of
the question. The Cubans, however, figured that since Washington had traded
five Taliban combatants for one US soldier, the White House would eventually
agree to trade their three spies for Alan Gross.
It took months of negotiations for US diplomats to convince the Cubans that
the only exchange the White House could abide would be trading spies for spies,
namely the Cuban agents for Sarraff. Finally the Cubans relented, and talks
turned to what one US official describes as "a bigger
package"—including the restoration of full diplomatic relations.
A Ticking Time Bomb
In defending the Bergdahl deal, Obama officials cited intelligence
indicating his mental and physical health were deteriorating after five years
of captivity. They faced a similarly dire situation with Alan Gross. More than four years after being arrested, Gross was
despondent over the administration's inability to obtain his freedom. At one
point he lost more than 100 pounds. By December 2013, when the coauthor of this
article, Peter Kornbluh, visited him in the military hospital where he was
held, he seemed determined to get out on his own—dead or alive. "I'm a
ticking time bomb. Tick. Tick. Tick," Gross warned during the three-hour
visit, in which he alluded to a plan to break down the "flimsy" door
of his cell and challenge the heavily armed guards on the other side. A few
months later, in April 2014, Gross went on a nine-day hunger strike. On his
65th birthday on May 2, he announced it would be the last he would spend in a
Cuban jail.
When Gross' terminally ill, 92-year-old mother, Evelyn, took a severe turn
for the worse in late May, negotiations became urgent. Meeting in
Ottawa in early June, the Cubans pushed for a quick prisoner trade, expressing
their fear that Gross would kill himself when his mother passed away. US
officials, meanwhile, worried that if Gross died in a Cuban prison, a change in
US policy would become politically impossible.
Kerry reached out to Cuban foreign minister Bruno Rodríguez and proposed a
"furlough" to the United States—Gross would wear an electronic
bracelet to allow the Cubans to monitor his movements, and he would return to
prison after his mother's death. "Alan promised unequivocally that he
would return to incarceration in Cuba after visiting his mother at the hospital
in Texas," his lawyer Scott Gilbert recalls, "and I offered to take
his place until he returned. That is how important this was."
But the Cubans considered the plan too risky. After Evelyn Gross died on
June 18, 2014, Kerry warned Rodríguez that if any harm came to Gross while in
Cuba's custody, the opportunity for better relations would be lost.
Gross was in "a difficult state of mind," Gilbert recalls. As the
summer progressed, he refused to meet with officials from the US Interests
Section who routinely brought him care packages, and he told his wife and
daughter that unless he was released soon, he'd never see them again. His
lifeline was Gilbert, who pressed the Cubans to allow him to speak to Gross
every day, and who traveled to Cuba 20 times to sustain his client's morale.
Stork Diplomacy
Gross was also taking regular calls from Tim Rieser, a top aide to Sen.
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). Rieser was instrumental in securing better conditions for Gross in return for one of the more unusual confidence-building
measures in the annals of diplomacy—a long-distance effort to impregnate the wife of
Gerardo Hernández, the jailed Cuban spymaster.
This idea was first conceived in early 2011, when the head of Cuba's
Interests Section in Washington met with the State Department's Julissa Reynoso
to deliver a diplomatic note stating that Cuba did not see "any
solution" to the incarceration of Hernández and that his wife, Adriana
Pérez, was nearing the age of 40. Cuba sought US support to "facilitate"
her ability to get pregnant.
It was one of the more unusual confidence-building measures in the annals
of diplomacy—a long-distance effort to impregnate the wife of Gerardo
Hernández, the jailed Cuban spymaster.
After what she calls a "sensitive" meeting on the matter, Reynoso
explored the possibility of a secret conjugal visit between Pérez and her
husband, but efforts to arrange such a rendezvous "fizzled out" due
to Bureau of Prisons regulations. Two years later, in February 2013, Pérez met
with Leahy, who was visiting Cuba with his wife, Marcelle. In a Havana hotel
room, Pérez made an impassioned appeal to the Leahys to help her find a way to
have a child with her husband, who had been in jail for 15 years. "It was
an emotional meeting," Leahy remembers. "She
made a personal appeal to Marcelle. She was afraid that she would never have
the chance to have a child. As parents and grandparents, we both wanted to try
to help her. It was a human thing. It had nothing to do with the politics of
the two countries." But it would.
Leahy asked Rieser to find a solution. A conjugal visit was a nonstarter,
but there was precedent for allowing an inmate to provide sperm for artificial
insemination. Eventually, Rieser secured approval and the Cubans flew Pérez to
a fertility clinic in Panama.
Meanwhile, Rieser was pressing the Cubans to improve the conditions for
Gross: "I wanted to make clear to them that we cared about the treatment
of their people, just as we expected them to care about the treatment of
ours." The Cubans reciprocated, permitting Gross to be examined by his own
doctors, giving him a computer and printer, and allowing him more outdoor
exercise.
As Pérez's pregnancy became obvious, the State Department asked the Cubans
to keep her out of the public eye, lest her condition stir speculation that a
US-Cuban rapprochement was in the works. "We had given our word to keep
the pregnancy and all of the process around it a secret in order not to
prejudice the greater objective, which was our freedom," Hernández later explained. When he landed in Cuba,
state television showed him being greeted by Raúl Castro and, to the
astonishment of his countrymen, a nine-months-pregnant wife. Three weeks later,
on January 6, 2015, their baby girl, Gema Hernández Pérez, was born.
Although Leahy's "stork diplomacy" contributed to the success of
the Cuba-US negotiations, even he was unaware of the secret talks underway.
Meanwhile, he served as the unofficial leader of a group of senators and
representatives who pressed Obama and his aides for change at every opportunity.
"All of us had been pushing the president when we saw him at ceremonial
functions for a few seconds—telling him, 'You've got to do something on
Cuba,'" recalls Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.).
Leahy decided that to get the attention of the president, a former legal
scholar, he'd have to flesh out the legal basis to release the Cuban spies. The
senator's staff collaborated with former White House counsel Greg Craig to
draft a 10-page memo of options "to secure Mr. Gross' release, and in so
doing break the logjam and change the course of U.S. policy towards Cuba, which
would be widely acclaimed as a major legacy achievement." The document,
dated February 7, laid out a course of action that would prove to be a close
match with the final accord. "It was a damn good memo," Craig says.
Still, it took until May 1 before Leahy, along with Sens. Carl Levin
(D-Mich.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Reps. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and
McGovern, finally met in the Oval Office with Obama, Biden, and Susan Rice.
They urged Obama to press for Gross' release and replace the policy of hostility with one of
engagement. "You said you were going to do this," McGovern reminded
the president. "Let's just do it!"
"We're working on it," Obama told them, but he gave no hint of
the back-channel diplomacy then well underway.
"There was a bit of tension with the president. We're pushing him, and
he's pushing back," McGovern recalls. "We were pretty
aggressive." At the meeting's end, the members were not very optimistic.
"We were not reassured that this was going to happen."
A New Normal
Three days earlier, a series of billboards appeared in the Washington Metro stations nearest to the White House and
State Department. "Mr. President, it's time to take action on Cuba
policy," read one. Another declared, "The American people are our
best ambassadors. It's time to allow all persons to travel freely to
Cuba." The ads, which generated significant media buzz, were sponsored by
a new advocacy group, #CubaNow, which positioned itself as the voice of the
younger, more moderate Cuban American community in Miami.
#CubaNow was the brainchild of the Trimpa Group, an unusual organization
that matched deep-pocketed donors seeking to change policy with a political
strategy and advocacy campaign. In 2003, for example, founder Ted Trimpa
developed a lobbying strategy to mount a marriage-equality movement across the
country financed by multimillionaire businessman Tim Gill.
Nine years later, in October 2012, Gill traveled to Cuba on a US-licensed
tour with a wealthy friend, Patty Ebrahimi, who was born and raised in Cuba but
left with her family a year after Fidel Castro seized power. Ebrahimi chafed
under the restrictions of the tour imposed by US Treasury regulations.
She couldn't go off on her own to visit the neighborhoods of her youth,
track down family friends, or see her old schools. "The idea that I could
go anywhere else in the world, including Vietnam, North Korea, or Iran, without
special permission from the US government but couldn't go to Cuba without a
license angered me," she recalled. As she vented her frustrations to Gill
in the lounge of the Saratoga Hotel in Havana, he offered a suggestion:
"You should use your money to change the policy." A few months later,
he introduced Ebrahimi to Trimpa.
After conducting a three-month survey of the political landscape, the
Trimpa Group reported that "the highest level of decision makers within
the Obama administration" wanted change—they just needed political
reinforcement to push for it. After consulting with her husband, Fred, the
former CEO and owner of Quark Software Inc., Patty gave the lobby shop $1 million
to finance a campaign to embolden the White House.
"My decision to take up this work was an emotional one," she
later said. "We did it because we wanted to help," Fred Ebrahimi
noted. "We did it because we thought we could be effective."
The Trimpa Group pulled out all the stops. It counseled Ebrahimi to make
donations to key political figures such as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
(D-Nev.) and Durbin—donations intended to gain access and "be in the
room," according to Trimpa's strategic plan. The lobby shop hired Luis
Miranda, who had recently left his position as Obama's director of Hispanic
media, and sought the blessing of Jim Messina, Obama's deputy chief of staff,
to launch a public campaign promoting a change in Cuba policy. The Trimpa team
also met with key foreign policy officials.
To all the players, the Trimpa Group insisted that there would be no
political blowback for Democrats in Florida if Obama changed Cuba policy. To
bolster that argument, they financed a series of opinion polls. One, conducted
by an Obama pollster, John Anzalone, found that Cuban Americans in
Florida—especially the younger generation—favored engagement. And the Atlantic
Council conducted a national poll sponsored by Trimpa that found, as a New York Times headline would put it, that a "Majority of Americans Favor Ties With
Cuba."
The polls were intended to "show broad support for change," "create
a new normal," and "give voice to the silent majority," says
James Williams, the political operative who oversaw the Trimpa Group's efforts.
Williams also had the support of groups key to the Cuba debate, ranging
from funding powerhouses (like Atlantic Philanthropies, the Ford Foundation,
and the Christopher Reynolds Foundation) to policy shops (the Washington Office
on Latin America, the Center for Democracy in the Americas, and the Latin
America Working Group) to elite think tanks (Brookings and the Council of the
Americas).
On May 19, 2014, this coalition released an open letter to Obama signed by 46 luminaries of the policy and business world, urging the president to engage with
Cuba. The signatories included former diplomats and retired military
officers—among them former UN Ambassador Thomas Pickering—and Cuban American
business leaders like Andres Fanjul, co-owner of a Florida-based multinational
sugar company. But the name that attracted the most attention was John
Negroponte, George W. Bush's director of national intelligence.
The same day, not coincidentally, the conservative US Chamber of Commerce announced that its president, Tom Donohue, would lead a delegation to Cuba to
"develop a better understanding of the country's current economic
environment and the state of its private sector."
Soon after that, the New York Times launched a two-month editorial
series slugged "Cuba: A New Start." The
weekly editorials were the work of Ernesto Londoño, who talked
to administration officials, Leahy's office, and the Trimpa Group. "There
was really no collusion or formal cooperation in what they were doing and what
we were doing," he told Terry Gross on Fresh Air. The Times simply saw an opportunity to push the policy it
advocated forward. "We figured it was worthwhile to give it a shot."
All these forces, in other words, were marshaled to push Obama through a
door whose threshold he had already crossed.
Divine Intervention
And let's not forget the pope.
Even as the secret negotiations continued, members of Congress kept looking
for allies to press Obama on Cuba, and provide him cover from attacks from the
right. In a September 2013 meeting at Rice's office, Durbin floated a new idea:
What about getting the new pope involved? As the first pontiff from Latin
America, Francis knew Cuba well.
After accompanying Pope John Paul II on his 1998 visit to the island,
Francis—then the assistant archbishop of Buenos Aires—had written a short book about the
trip, Dialogues Between John Paul II and Fidel Castro. And the Vatican
had credibility with Havana because of its consistent opposition to the
embargo.
Pope Francis talks with Cuban President Raúl Castro during a private
audience at the Vatican May 10, 2015. Gregorio
Borgia/Pool/Reuters
All parties saw the wisdom of divine intervention. Leahy sent a
confidential message to Cuban Cardinal Jaime Ortega, asking him to encourage
the pope to help resolve the prisoner issue. Drawing on the close ties between
Obama's chief of staff, Denis McDonough, and Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of
Washington, the White House also "got word to the Vatican that the president
was eager to discuss this" at an upcoming meeting in March with the pope
in Rome, according to Craig. And at a strategy meeting of the Cuba advocacy
groups, Tim Phillips of the peace group Beyond
Conflict suggested approaching Cardinal Seán O'Malley of
Boston. "We knew that O'Malley was very close to the pope," recalled
Craig, who had ties to the Catholic Church hierarchy in Boston from his days as
a foreign policy aide to Sen. Ted Kennedy. "O'Malley had spent time in
Latin America, spoke Spanish fluently, had known the pope before he became
pope, and had a relationship with the pope that was unusual, certainly much, much
better than McCarrick's."
In early March 2014, a small group of Cuba policy advocates, including
representatives of the Trimpa Group, Phillips, and Craig, met with Cardinal
O'Malley in the rectory of the Cathedral of the Holy Cross in Boston. "We
explained the recent trends, the conversations with POTUS and others in the
administration and Congress," Phillips recalls, "and indicated this
was a historic moment, and a message from the pope to POTUS would be
significant in moving the process forward." Craig brought a letter from
Leahy urging the cardinal to focus the pope's attention on the
"humanitarian issue" of the prisoner exchange. Leahy personally
delivered a similar message to Cardinal McCarrick, and arranged for yet another
to be sent to Cardinal Ortega in Havana. There now were three cardinals urging
the pope—as yet unaware of the secret dialogue between Washington and Havana—to
put Cuba on the agenda with Obama.
Three weeks later, Obama met the pope in his
private library, a marble-floored chamber overlooking St. Peter's Square.
There, they spoke for an hour under a frieze of Renaissance frescoes. Obama
"told the pope that we had something going with Cuba and said it would be
useful if he could play a role," according to a White House official
familiar with the meeting. A few days later, Francis summoned Ortega to enlist
his help.
Over the summer, the pope wrote forceful, confidential letters to Obama and
Raúl Castro, imploring the two leaders "to resolve humanitarian questions of common interest, including the
situation of certain prisoners, in order to initiate a new phase in
relations." To safeguard his communications, the pope sent both letters
via papal courier to Havana—with instructions to Cardinal Ortega to personally
deliver the message into the president's hands. Ortega then sent his top aide
to Washington to advance his clandestine diplomatic mission. But arranging a
secret face-to-face meeting with the president of the United States was easier
said than done. Alerted to the problem, Cardinal McCarrick conferred with White
House officials, who enlisted his help as a secret back-channel go-between. In
early August, McCarrick traveled to Cuba carrying a note from Obama that asked
Ortega to entrust McCarrick with delivering the pope's letter to the White
House. But Ortega's papal instructions were to deliver the message himself.
McCarrick left Cuba empty-handed.
To make sure the meeting did not leak, US officials kept Cardinal Ortega's
name off of the White House visitor logs. Meeting with the president on the
patio adjacent to the Rose Garden, Ortega delivered the pope's letter in which
Francis offered to "help in any way."
Back in Washington, McCarrick worked with McDonough to arrange a secret
meeting for Ortega with the president. On the morning of August 18, Ortega gave
a talk at Georgetown University—providing a cover story for his presence in
Washington—and then quietly went to the White House. (To make sure the meeting
did not leak, US officials kept Ortega's name off the White House visitor
logs.) Meeting with the president on the patio adjacent to the Rose Garden,
Ortega finally completed his mission of delivering the pope's sensitive
communication, in which he offered to "help in any way."
It was a convoluted process, but an unprecedented gesture. "We haven't
received communications like this from the pope that I'm aware of other than
this instance," a senior US official recalls. "And that gave, I think, greater impetus and momentum for us
to move forward."
Open To Change?
By late October, the pope had invited the negotiators to Rome. "It was less a matter of breaking some
substantive logjam but more the confidence of having an external party we could
rely on," says a senior US official.
It was at the Vatican that the two sides hammered out their final agreement
on the prisoner exchange and restoring diplomatic relations. Rhodes and Zuniga
also noted Obama's intention to ease regulations on travel and trade, and to
allow US telecom companies to help Cuban state enterprises expand internet
access. They acknowledged these initiatives were aimed at fostering greater
openness in Cuba, though they delivered this message respectfully. Cuban
officials said that while they had no intention of changing
their political system to suit the United States, they had reviewed the
Americans' list of prisoners jailed for political activities and would release 53 of them as
a goodwill gesture. The pope agreed to act as
guarantor of the final accord.
Obama's National Security Council met on November 6 to sign off on the
details. Later that month, the negotiating teams convened one last time in
Canada to arrange the logistics of the prisoner exchange.
On December 12, Zuniga called Alan Gross' wife, Judy, to the Executive
Office Building to tell her the good news. Four days later, on the eve of
Hanukkah, Scott Gilbert called his client to tell him he'd soon be a free man.
"I'll believe it when I see it," Gross replied.
He didn't have to wait long: Early the next morning Gross was taken from his prison cell in Havana to a small military airport,
where he was met by his wife, his attorney, and members of Congress who had
worked to win his release. The prisoner exchange was choreographed so carefully
that the blue and white presidential plane sent to bring Gross home was not
cleared to depart Havana until the plane carrying the three Cuban spies touched
down on a nearby runway.
Once in the air, Gross was given some of his favorite foods—popcorn and
corned beef on rye—and took a call from Obama. After clearing Cuban airspace,
he called his daughters to tell them simply, "I'm free."
At noon, Obama announced the deal with Cuba to the nation: "We will end an outdated approach that, for
decades, has failed to advance our interests. Neither the American nor Cuban
people are well served by a rigid policy that is rooted in events that took
place before most of us were born." Raúl Castro was more restrained,
focusing on the return of the three Cuban "heroes." Normalization of
diplomatic relations received just a single sentence, followed immediately by a
reminder that the embargo —"the heart of the matter"—remained in
place.
Obama called on Congress to rescind the embargo—a policy, as he said, "long past its expiration date." But with
Republican majorities in both houses and a presidential election in the offing,
getting Congress to end the sanctions looks to be a lot harder than reaching an
agreement with Havana. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has led the Republican tirades against the deal, says the president gave the Cuban government "everything it asked for" and got nothing in return. "I am
committed to unravel as many of these changes as possible," he added.
While Rubio and the rest of the old-guard anti-Cuba lobby fume, the process
of normalization is moving forward. Obama officially removed Cuba from the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism, and US
and Cuban flags fly over the newly reestablished embassies in Havana and
Washington.
But maybe the most symbolic moment came at the Seventh Summit of the
Americas in April, when Obama and Castro met privately in person for the first time and reaffirmed their commitment to
normalize relations. Although Castro prefaced his speech before the assembly
with a 50-minute litany of US transgressions against Cuba, at the end his tone changed to conciliation and even warmth.
"I have told President Obama that I get very emotional talking about the
revolution. I apologize to him because President Obama had no responsibility
for this," Castro said, noting that nine other US presidents could have
reached out to Cuba and didn't. "In my opinion, President Obama is an honest
man. I have read his autobiographies and I admire him and his life and think
his behavior comes from his humble background. There, I said it."
Obama chose not to revisit old bitterness: "America never makes a claim about being perfect. We do make a claim
about being open to change. The United States will not be imprisoned by the
past. We're looking to the future."
This article is adapted from the new, updated edition of the authors' book,
Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and
Havana, to be published in October, ©2015 University of North Carolina Press.
This
article is adapted from the new, updated edition of the authors' book, Back
Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and
Havana, to be published in October, ©2015 University of North Carolina Press.